
ryokan and hotels whose official websites we searched for a written tattoo policy — as of 12 Oct 2026. A few rules come from a prefecture database or a group-wide policy instead, and a few inns have no official site; each inn's page says which.
Nationwide survey · as of 12 Oct 2026

ryokan and hotels whose official websites we searched for a written tattoo policy — as of 12 Oct 2026. A few rules come from a prefecture database or a group-wide policy instead, and a few inns have no official site; each inn's page says which.

Tattoos welcome in the shared baths — in writing, quoted with its source.

Shared baths are fine if the tattoo is covered — the inn's words say how.

The shared baths say no, but the inn offers a private or in-room bath instead.

Tattooed guests refused, in writing.

No tattoo rule published — but a hot-spring private bath or in-room onsen is listed (usually on the official site). It may provide an alternative, but the inn has not stated a tattoo rule; confirm before booking.

No tattoo rule on the official site and no confirmed private hot-spring bath. Not a yes and not a no — ask before you book.
One bar, all 631 inns. Solid colours are the 174 with a written rule; the rest — 451 — publish no rule (244 of them with a confirmed private hot-spring bath).
Counts are inns, not baths. “Says nothing” means no tattoo policy found on the official site — not a yes and not a no. Photos in this section are atmosphere only — none shows an inn from the survey.
A rule exists but the inn's pages disagree, or it only covers day bathing. Being re-checked.
On 29 Sep 2026 we counted 634 inns: 18 shared OK, 26 OK if covered, 23 private only, 66 not allowed and 501 saying nothing.
Since then we re-read every inn. 451 still publish no rule; 244 of those now have a confirmed private hot-spring bath. 634 → 631: one inn is no longer listed and two duplicates were merged.
Register as of 12 Oct 2026; rules last checked 11 Oct 2026. The first survey on 29 Sep 2026 counted 634 inns; since then one inn is no longer listed and two duplicate rows were merged.
Every inn, its status, the kind of source and the day it was checked — 631 rows, UTF-8 CSV. No booking links.
Download CSV ↓Columns: slug, name_en, name_ja, pref, area, status, source_type, checked_at. Free to cite with a link back to this page.
| Status | What it means | Inns | Share | 29 Sep |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shared OK | Tattoos are allowed in the shared bath. | 30 | 5% | 18 |
| Covered OK | Allowed in the shared bath if the tattoo is covered. | 40 | 6% | 26 |
| Private only | Not in the shared bath, but a private bath is confirmed. | 35 | 6% | 23 |
| Not allowed | The cited rule does not permit tattoos — see the stay page for which baths it covers. | 69 | 11% | 66 |
| Needs check | Evidence is conflicting or out of date; being re-checked. | 6 | <1% | — |
| Private likely | No tattoo rule stated; a hot-spring private bath is listed (our inference, not the inn's word). | 244 | 39% | — |
| Says nothing | The official site says nothing. This does not mean OK. | 207 | 33% | — |
| All inns | On 29 Sep 2026 the 501 inns that said nothing were one group; they are now split into “Private likely”, “Says nothing” and “Needs check”. | 631 | 100% | 634 |